|
||||||||||||||||
Wkileaks and Zimbabwe
http://www.futureofcapitalism.com/2011/01/wkileaks-and-zimbabwe
Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Gordon Crovitz takes up an anti-Wikileaks argument earlier proffered by Jamie Kirchick. Mr. Crovitz writes:
I didn't find this argument persuasive when offered by Mr. Kirchick and I don't find it persuasive when offered by Mr. Crovitz, either. There are plenty of people who can reasonably be blamed for the situation he outlines. There's Robert Mugabe. There's Mr. Tsvangirai, for choosing to serve as prime minister in Mugabe's regime — "one of the world's most repressive" — rather than insisting on his complete ouster, and for two-facedly telling U.S. and European diplomats one thing and the voters of Zimbabwe a second, different thing. It's always a risky thing, and rarely a good move, for a politician in a democracy to tell the voters one thing while telling someone else something else. There are the American government and the United Nations for failing to execute a better policy there, and the international press for playing little attention to the situation there. Not to forget the people of Zimbabwe for letting this all stand, or the former colonial power on the scene, Great Britain. Wikileaks and its defenders would have to rank pretty low on the list. by Ira Stoll | Jan 3, 2011 at 10:47 am receive the latest by email: subscribe to the free futureofcapitalism.com mailing list Comment on this item |
Subscribe to the Mailing List ADVERTISEMENT For your Las Vegas Travel needs visit Best of Vegas. For the best prices on Orlando Theme Parks visit Best of Orlando. Most Mailed |
|||||||||||||||
|
© 2012 FutureOfCapitalism, LLC. home | archives | about | mailing list | how to help | FoC @ facebook | FoC @ twitter | terms of use | privacy policy |
||||||||||||||||