|
||||||||||||||||
|
Related Topics Infrastructure Bank
http://www.futureofcapitalism.com/2011/03/infrastructure-bank
From Bob Herbert's column in the New York Times:
If these projects are so "commercially viable," why do they need loans or loan guarantees from the government? One of the things about commercial viability, after all, is that it's often in the eye of the beholder. Another thing is that what looks commercially viable at one point turns out to be not so commercially viable at another point. Remember the Evergreen Solar factory in Massachusetts and the Range Fuels cellulosic ethanol plant in Georgia? The same reasoning that applies to many other government subsidies applies here. If the projects are so good, they shouldn't need a subsidy. And if the projects aren't so good, why is the government taxing the private sector to back mediocre projects rather than leaving the money in the private sector where it can be allocated more efficiently to projects that are strong enough to attract funding on their own without a subsidy? The Times column says Senator Kerry expects "bipartisan" support for his bill, and indeed infrastructure spending is a big favorite of the Chamber of Commerce and of companies like CAT and GE and Bechtel that profit from it. It'll be interesting to see which, if any, Republicans sponsor the bill along with Senator Kerry, a Democrat from Massachusetts. by Ira Stoll | Mar 12, 2011 at 8:11 pm Related Topics: Energy, General Electric, Politics receive the latest by email: subscribe to the free futureofcapitalism.com mailing list Comment on this item |
Subscribe to the Mailing List ADVERTISEMENT For your Las Vegas Travel needs visit Best of Vegas. For the best prices on Orlando Theme Parks visit Best of Orlando. Most Mailed |
|||||||||||||||
|
© 2012 FutureOfCapitalism, LLC. home | archives | about | mailing list | how to help | FoC @ facebook | FoC @ twitter | terms of use | privacy policy |
||||||||||||||||