|
||||||||||||||||
|
Related Topics Second Liens and Firsts
http://www.futureofcapitalism.com/2011/03/second-liens-and-firsts
From a column in today's New York Times provided by ProPublica, a non-profit news organization:
This idea that these losses should be allocated or reallocated based on how sympathetic or deserving the entities receiving the losses are is a flawed one. After all, pension funds and university endowments (financial aid for poor scholarship recipients! funding for cancer research!) invest in hedge funds and in shares of large banks, too. Many pensioners are guaranteed their benefits regardless of the pension fund performance, so the loss comes not from a pensioner but, in the case of a government pension fund, is made up by the taxpayer, or, in the case of a private pension fund, shareholders. And while the columnist throws "life insurance companies" in there with the small banks and the pension funds as if they are somehow especially sympathetic characters like the widows and orphans who benefit from life insurance policies, it's not clear to me that they are inherently more deserving or sympathetic than banks. AIG, after all, was a life insurance company. Better to stick to a rule of law that applies impartially to everyone, whether they are a pensioner, a life insurance company, a large bank or a small bank. by Ira Stoll | Mar 17, 2011 at 9:07 am Related Topics: AIG, Banking, Capital Markets Regulation, Non-Profits receive the latest by email: subscribe to the free futureofcapitalism.com mailing list Reader comments on this item
Comment on this item |
Subscribe to the Mailing List ADVERTISEMENT For your Las Vegas Travel needs visit Best of Vegas. For the best prices on Orlando Theme Parks visit Best of Orlando. Most Mailed |
|||||||||||||||
|
© 2012 FutureOfCapitalism, LLC. home | archives | about | mailing list | how to help | FoC @ facebook | FoC @ twitter | terms of use | privacy policy |
||||||||||||||||