Zandi, the Jobs Report and the Press
For his February report on the January employment situation, Politico Morning Money's Ben White led off with a gloomy prediction:
In fact, the payroll survey jumped by 243,000, and the unemployment rate dropped to 8.3%. Mr. Zandi and Mr. White were wrong.
Today it was the Wall Street Journal's "Ahead of the Tape" column that fell for Mr. Zandi, who this month was optimistic rather than pessimistic. Under the headline "Jobs News Could be So Good That It's Bad," the Journal pondered "what is likely to be yet another positive sign for the economy," and speculated on the effect on interest rates and markets "if the consensus expectation of 210,000 new jobs is met or exceeded."
Said the Journal:
This time around, in fact, the 120,000 increase in payrolls was "the fewest in five months," and "less than the most pessimistic forecast in a Bloomberg News survey in which the median estimate called for a 205,000 rise."
At a certain point, one starts to wonder why anyone pays any attention to these forecasters, or to the press that reports on them. Complex systems are hard to predict. Mr. Zandi doesn't seem particularly accurate at predicting the monthly payroll numbers. Neither do the professional journalists who do so for a living at places like Politico and the Wall Street Journal. Here's one prediction you can bank on: next month, when it is time for the Bureau of Labor Statistics to roll out its monthly numbers, there will be a preview article in some major news outlet that quotes Mark Zandi. Chances are, it won't be any more accurate than these two examples.
Reader comments on this item
Comment on this item
Subscribe to the Mailing List