|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Related Topics Amtrak Loses Money on Food
http://www.futureofcapitalism.com/2012/08/amtrak-loses-money-on-food
A lot of businesses operate with low margins in some areas but higher ones in others. Movie theaters, for example, make a lot of money selling high-priced popcorn and soda. And airlines seem to have cut base ticket prices low, but are now charging money for food and in some cases in-flight wireless Internet service or movies. Leave it to our government-owned passenger railroad, Amtrak, to figure out a way to lose money while selling food to a captive audience. USA Today reports:
Republican Rep. John Mica, chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, called the losses "outrageous." It does seem pretty outrageous. On the other hand, the whole railroad, with the possible exception of a few busy routes, runs at a loss. So selling something for less than it costs is Amtrak's business. If taxpayers, including those who work in competing transportation businesses like airlines, buses, or cars, subsidize Amtrak's losses on trains, why is it any more outrageous for Amtrak customers who don't buy food on the train, and for taxpayers who don't ride Amtrak at all, to subsidize Amtrak's losses serving cheeseburgers and soda to some passengers? Is there a difference here that I'm missing, or are they both outrageous? by Editor | Aug 3, 2012 at 10:13 am Related Topics: Government ownership, Government Spending receive the latest by email: subscribe to the free futureofcapitalism.com mailing list Reader comments on this item
Comment on this item |
Subscribe to the Mailing List ADVERTISEMENT Most Mailed |
||||||||||||||||||
|
© 2013 FutureOfCapitalism, LLC. home | archives | about | mailing list | how to help | FoC @ facebook | FoC @ twitter | terms of use | privacy policy news transparency | smartertimes |
|||||||||||||||||||