Regardless of their personnel policies why should taxpayers fund them
Reader comment on: The Right on Public Broadcasting
Submitted by Drtaxsacto (United States), Oct 27, 2010 17:42
NPR was in their rights to fire Williams (although they did it stupidly) but why should we continue to fund them from public money?
Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.
Submit a comment on this article
Other reader comments on this item
| Title |
By |
Date |
| Is NPR also unfairly working to acquire new affiliates? [190 words] | rintin | Oct 31, 2010 23:30 |
| Juan Williams Dismissal From NPR [248 words] | The Vail Spot | Oct 27, 2010 23:10 |
| National PUBLIC Radio...national PUBLIC copyright! [43 words] | SenatorMark4 | Oct 27, 2010 19:32 |
| NPR news ain't that great... [60 words] | Dantes | Oct 27, 2010 18:24 |
| Defund [44 words] | Kathy Kinsley | Oct 27, 2010 17:55 |
| But what about the funding? [41 words] | setnaffa | Oct 27, 2010 17:50 |
| ⇒ Regardless of their personnel policies why should taxpayers fund them [24 words] | Drtaxsacto | Oct 27, 2010 17:42 |
| YES!!! [55 words] | Marty | Oct 27, 2010 17:17 |
| Network and affiliate aren't the same [122 words] | Bohemond | Oct 27, 2010 17:05 |
| No Minsitry of Truth [96 words] | Wesley Clark | Oct 27, 2010 17:02 |
| OK, but ... [109 words] | Dwight Bobson | Oct 27, 2010 16:57 |
| ↔ It's the principle of the thing [221 words] | Bohemond | Oct 27, 2010 17:31 |
| NPR Defund. [71 words] | Chuck Moss | Oct 27, 2010 16:52 |
Comment on this item
