relatively
Reader comment on: Obama on Gibbs Pay
Submitted by m4ximusprim3 (United States), Jan 5, 2011 14:11
Relative to someone who serves a similar function in the private sector working the same hours, it's modest pay. It's a true statement.
I'm sure Mr. Gibbs and Obama would also readily agree that Gibbs could afford a higher tax rate. They're not mutually exclusive.
Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.
Submit a comment on this article
Other reader comments on this item
| Title |
By |
Date |
| 6 years [89 words] | jtide | Jan 8, 2011 08:29 |
| 24/7 [219 words] | orange thunder | Jan 6, 2011 07:58 |
| clearly misrepresented [29 words] | john | Jan 5, 2011 20:08 |
| A 'Relatively' Arrogant Thing to Say [44 words] | JeffH | Jan 5, 2011 16:22 |
| It is a lot of money [43 words] | Anonymous | Jan 5, 2011 15:15 |
| Reading is Fundamental [32 words] | xyz | Jan 5, 2011 15:14 |
| clarification [65 words] | Chad | Jan 5, 2011 14:49 |
| ↔ Relative but earned? [101 words] | Larry | Jan 5, 2011 20:04 |
| I think what he meant was [72 words] | Lily Ng | Jan 5, 2011 14:48 |
| Hourly Factor [64 words] | Dubs | Jan 5, 2011 14:34 |
| Misleading... [99 words] | Sam | Jan 5, 2011 14:29 |
| Read carefully [65 words] | reader1 | Jan 5, 2011 14:29 |
| TIL [9 words] | Jason Allen | Jan 5, 2011 14:12 |
| ↔ Big word but not that hard... [21 words] | Ty_Law | Jan 5, 2011 14:59 |
| ⇒ relatively [45 words] | m4ximusprim3 | Jan 5, 2011 14:11 |
Comment on this item
