PROject Veritas, not ProJECT Veritas

Reader comment on: Entrapping NPR

Submitted by Charlie (United States), Mar 9, 2011 16:43

I do believe "Project" is being used as noun rather than verb in the group's epithet. If verb, yes, you would expect a scrupulous effort to employ truth themselves. But if noun, then it clearly sounds more like they are getting at the truth, perhaps no matter what it takes. I certainly think the mock mullahs got at a big ol' sloppy truth, and I have no problem with the way they did it. They ain't ABC here; there's room for guerilla journos too.


Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
A scandal at NYT and WaPo [61 words]DavidMar 10, 2011 16:56
"You can't cheat an honest man" [4 words]2WarAbnVetMar 10, 2011 16:14
Stoll is correct
[w/response] [136 words]
Christopher McMar 10, 2011 10:14
Food Lion [89 words]DavidMar 10, 2011 16:52
Were you this concerned when 60 Minutes did Ambush Journalism? [19 words]John HinesMar 9, 2011 23:56
Principles [79 words]Rich HandMar 9, 2011 17:49
⇒ PROject Veritas, not ProJECT Veritas [84 words]CharlieMar 9, 2011 16:43
Excuse me??? [255 words]KindwarriorMar 9, 2011 13:09
Does it matter? [196 words]Mike KloppelMar 9, 2011 11:54
Oh, it matters a LOT [377 words]Rich MatareseMar 9, 2011 15:18
Entrapping NPR [14 words]PUMABydesign001Mar 9, 2011 09:33
Agreed!
[w/response] [106 words]
SophieMar 9, 2011 09:22
Flipping over the rock [228 words]Rich MatareseMar 9, 2011 00:45
Missing the Point [120 words]jjMar 9, 2011 15:51
Thank you [81 words]JosephCMar 8, 2011 22:46

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to PROject Veritas, not ProJECT Veritas by Charlie

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.