PROject Veritas, not ProJECT Veritas
Reader comment on: Entrapping NPR
Submitted by Charlie (United States), Mar 9, 2011 16:43
I do believe "Project" is being used as noun rather than verb in the group's epithet. If verb, yes, you would expect a scrupulous effort to employ truth themselves. But if noun, then it clearly sounds more like they are getting at the truth, perhaps no matter what it takes. I certainly think the mock mullahs got at a big ol' sloppy truth, and I have no problem with the way they did it. They ain't ABC here; there's room for guerilla journos too.
Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.
Submit a comment on this article
Other reader comments on this item
Title |
By |
Date |
A scandal at NYT and WaPo [61 words] | David | Mar 10, 2011 16:56 |
"You can't cheat an honest man" [4 words] | 2WarAbnVet | Mar 10, 2011 16:14 |
Stoll is correct [w/response] [136 words] | Christopher Mc | Mar 10, 2011 10:14 |
↔ Food Lion [89 words] | David | Mar 10, 2011 16:52 |
Were you this concerned when 60 Minutes did Ambush Journalism? [19 words] | John Hines | Mar 9, 2011 23:56 |
Principles [79 words] | Rich Hand | Mar 9, 2011 17:49 |
⇒ PROject Veritas, not ProJECT Veritas [84 words] | Charlie | Mar 9, 2011 16:43 |
Excuse me??? [255 words] | Kindwarrior | Mar 9, 2011 13:09 |
Does it matter? [196 words] | Mike Kloppel | Mar 9, 2011 11:54 |
↔ Oh, it matters a LOT [377 words] | Rich Matarese | Mar 9, 2011 15:18 |
Entrapping NPR [14 words] | PUMABydesign001 | Mar 9, 2011 09:33 |
Agreed! [w/response] [106 words] | Sophie | Mar 9, 2011 09:22 |
Flipping over the rock [228 words] | Rich Matarese | Mar 9, 2011 00:45 |
↔ Missing the Point [120 words] | jj | Mar 9, 2011 15:51 |
Thank you [81 words] | JosephC | Mar 8, 2011 22:46 |
Comment on this item