Social security wasn't supposed to be welfare!

Reader comment on: Romney's 'Gifts' Explanation

Submitted by Tibor R. Machan (United States), Nov 20, 2012 20:46

While it is objectionable because it involves coercion and confiscation, social security is still paid for by those who eventually get it returned to them. So Ledeen's comparison is invalid.


Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
⇒ Social security wasn't supposed to be welfare! [30 words]Tibor R. MachanNov 20, 2012 20:46
Even Prof. Machan gets it wrong (in part)!! [142 words]David in IrvineNov 22, 2012 14:49
Getting back what you put in. [62 words]Tibor R. MachanNov 22, 2012 22:25
Mitt is right [40 words]Ralph RodgersNov 20, 2012 11:58
Makers and Takers [213 words]James HallNov 20, 2012 11:44
confusing comment [30 words]MattNov 20, 2012 12:04

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Social security wasn't supposed to be welfare! by Tibor R. Machan

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.