Projections

Reader comment on: Obama's Trillion-Dollar Tax Increase

Submitted by David Gerstman (United States), Apr 16, 2013 14:24

I'm not an expert on this stuff and you've provided some useful observations about what the government projects these increases will raise and what can reasonably expect to be raised.

But from my experience the most troubling is the cigaretted tax hike. Since it's a sin tax part of the logic of it is to discourage cigarette usage. Does the guess that the tax hike will generate $78 billion over ten years assume an increase in the use of cigarettes or even a stabilization of smoking rates?

In other words, is the $78 billion based on serious analysis? or is it just a nice sounding number derived from superficial analysis? More broadly, were any of the other projections developed through careful economic analyses, or they just simply wishful thinking estimates? Will the government go back after a year or two years and see if the tax hikes are generating the "expected" revenue or will it simply decide that it needs more money and raise more taxes again using flimsy pretexts to justify the hikes?


Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
⇒ Projections [174 words]David GerstmanApr 16, 2013 14:24
A poor choice. [60 words]BobApr 10, 2013 16:24

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Projections by David Gerstman

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.