|
||||||||||||||||
|
Related Topics Citigroup, Treasury, and Racial Set-Asides
http://www.futureofcapitalism.com/2010/10/citigroup-treasury-and-racial-set-asides
The Treasury Department this morning announced plans to sell another 1.5 billion shares of Citigroup common stock: "Treasury currently owns approximately 3.6 billion shares of Citigroup common stock and expects to continue selling its shares in the market in an orderly fashion. The sale of 1.5 billion additional shares of Citigroup common stock, as authorized pursuant to the fourth trading plan, would bring Treasury's holdings of Citigroup common stock to approximately 7 percent of total shares outstanding — down from a high of approximately 27 percent." What caught my eye in the bottom of the press release, though, was the news that "As part of the disposition program, Morgan Stanley agreed to provide opportunities for involvement by small broker-dealers, including minority- and women-owned broker-dealers. Morgan Stanley has entered into agreements with the following 12 broker-dealers: Cabrera Capital Markets, LLC; Great Pacific Securities, Inc.; Guzman & Company; Kaufman Bros., L.P.; Loop Capital Markets; M. Ramsey King Securities, Inc.; Mischler Financial Group; M.R. Beal & Company; Sturdivant & Co. Inc.; Valdes and Moreno, Inc.; The Williams Capital Group, L.P.; and Wm Smith & Co." An earlier Treasury press release gives details on the 12 firms:
I can understand and sympathize with the impulse behind these sorts of programs. Rather than simply cutting government checks to disabled veterans or historically discriminated against minority groups, it's better to help them build businesses, which generate jobs and real wealth, the argument goes. The other side of the argument, though, is that in a situation such as the Citigroup share sale, the government ends up choosing its business partners based not on who can get the best sale price on the stock for the taxpayers, but on the race, gender, or disabled veteran status of the owners of the firms. The minority-owned firms wind up marketing themselves not primarily on their excellence but rather on their minority status: Look, for example, at the home page of the Mischler Financial Group Web site or of Kaufman Bros. Many of the individuals involved were well on their way to success via Ivy League educational institutions before getting any help from these preferences for minority-owned businesses; Kaufman's CEO, Benny Lorenzo, for example, has a Harvard MBA, while the Williams Capital Group's Christopher Williams has an MBA from Dartmouth's Tuck School of Business. Getting certified as a minority or women-owned business is a time-consuming process that can involve spending lots of money on well-connected lawyers. And sometimes a second injustice is committed in an effort to rectify an initial injustice. Suppose a child of Carlos Slim, according to Forbes the world's richest man, moved from Mexico to America and set up a Hispanic-owned broker-dealer. Should that firm get a preference over one begun by the son of a poor Italian-American janitor? Disentangling America from Citigroup is a complicated matter in its own right. Righting or rectifying America's historical record of discrimination is also a complicated matter in its own right. Trying to combine the two in one transaction seems like it's asking an awful lot. The Treasury press releases don't disclose how much money this business will end up being worth to each of the firms. by Ira Stoll | Oct 19, 2010 at 10:08 am Related Topics: Banking, Capital Markets Regulation, Timothy Geithner receive the latest by email: subscribe to the free futureofcapitalism.com mailing list Comment on this item |
Subscribe to the Mailing List ADVERTISEMENT For your Las Vegas Travel needs visit Best of Vegas. For the best prices on Orlando Theme Parks visit Best of Orlando. |
|||||||||||||||
|
© 2012 FutureOfCapitalism, LLC. home | archives | about | mailing list | how to help | FoC @ facebook | FoC @ twitter | terms of use | privacy policy |
||||||||||||||||