|
||||||||||||||||
|
Related Topics Steve Jobs Compensation
http://www.futureofcapitalism.com/2011/01/steve-jobs-compensation
The Wall Street Journal has an article that appears under the headline "Apple's Jobs Grows Richer Despite $1 Salary." It reports, "Apple Inc. chief Steve Jobs again took an annual salary of $1 in 2010, representing his total compensation for the year, the technology giant said Friday in a regulatory filing." It goes on, "Mr. Jobs is widely known for taking the $1 salary, which has been his practice since rejoining the company as chief executive officer in 1997." If you actually take a look at the 2011 Apple proxy statement, though, you'll see that, "In 2001, the Company entered into a Reimbursement Agreement with Mr. Jobs for the reimbursement of expenses incurred by Mr. Jobs in the operation of his private plane when used for the Company's business. The Company recognized a total of approximately $248,000, $4,000 and $871,000 in expenses pursuant to the Reimbursement Agreement during 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively." And the 2008 proxy statement makes clear that what the 2011 proxy statement refers to as "his private plane" was actually bought by the company and given to Mr. Jobs:
In the 2004 proxy statement, Apple disclosed a restricted stock award to Mr. Jobs that it valued at $74,750,000. It also explained:
In other words, Apple gave Mr. Jobs $74.75 million worth of stock and a $90 million airplane, plus at least $41.8 million in "tax assistance" to Mr. Jobs for the airplane. And the Wall Street Journal headline and news article tell readers about the fact that he's taken $1 a year in salary since 1997. The Journal story acknowledges that Mr. Jobs "owns about 5.5 million shares of the company," but doesn't say anything about how he received them. Look, even at those compensation levels, Mr. Jobs may be a bargain — Apple has done very well. But to make the guy into a hero for taking $1 a year in salary since 1997 when he's also received all that other compensation not mentioned in the Journal article but mentioned here and in the old proxy statements is more than a little misleading. by Ira Stoll | Jan 9, 2011 at 3:43 pm Related Topics: Compensation, Taxes receive the latest by email: subscribe to the free futureofcapitalism.com mailing list Reader comments on this item
Comment on this item |
Subscribe to the Mailing List ADVERTISEMENT |
|||||||||||||||
|
© 2013 FutureOfCapitalism, LLC. home | archives | about | mailing list | how to help | FoC @ facebook | FoC @ twitter | terms of use | privacy policy news transparency | smartertimes |
||||||||||||||||