There's an effort underway by the left to have the government label speech that the left disagrees with as "disinformation," and to suppress that speech. By that definition, conservative websites such as the Federalist or the Daily Wire or Newsmax are "disinformation," while left-wing websites such as the New York Times are trustworthy. The Biden administration even hired a former aide to Madeleine Albright, James P. Rubin, to implement this effort. The New York Times covers it today under the jump headline "Fight Against Disinformation Is Under Fire From Right." That is comical. If the Trump administration or George W. Bush administration had hired a former Donald Rumsfeld or John Bolton aide to define the New York Times and the Washington Post and CNN as "disinformation," making it harder to access those sites from government computers and pressing technology companies to limit the reach of the content, you can bet that the Times would be covering it as a threat to free speech rather than as a "fight against disinformation."
There is genuine information warfare against America coming from places such as Iran, Russia, and Communist China. The U.S. government, for national security reasons, should probably indeed do something about it. But it's perilous, in part because labeling ideas or publications as "disinformation" can prematurely shut down debate on things such as, say, the Covid-19 lab leak theory, in ways that distort American political discourse.