Sound investment for Goldman

Reader comment on: How Goldman Backed Moore's 'Capitalism' Movie

Submitted by Susan (United States), Sep 25, 2009 10:05

Actually, Michael Moore acknowledges the irony of the corporate mentality: they hate his message, but back his films because the films make money. A well-programmed capitalist might call this a mature, responsible approach to a profitable business transaction. As a lifelong student of human folly, I call it funny as hell.

Kudos to Goldman; kudos to Michael Moore. The film is ultimately entertainment, though of the genre that encourages viewers to think. Or is that the worrisome factor?

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title	By	Date
What happened to value production and voluntary trade of value for value? [276 words]	Leslie G Harper	Nov 19, 2009
Capitalism: The New God [159 words]	Jill Barraclough	Nov 12, 2009
A comment ? [w/response] [58 words]	dirk	Sep 26, 2009
An unrepentant Marxist take on Moore's movie [9 words]	Louis Proyect	Sep 26, 2009
⇒ Sound investment for Goldman [78 words]	Susan	Sep 25, 2009
Well Crafted? Maybe Not [98 words]	Rory	Sep 25, 2009
entertainment, nothing more [43 words]	jed	Sep 24, 2009

Comment on this item

Subscribe to the Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Follow Us On:

RSS Twitter

Facebook Google Buzz

Newest

Most Viewed

Most Mailed