Sound investment for Goldman

Reader comment on: How Goldman Backed Moore's 'Capitalism' Movie

Submitted by Susan (United States), Sep 25, 2009 10:05

Actually, Michael Moore acknowledges the irony of the corporate mentality: they hate his message, but back his films because the films make money. A well-programmed capitalist might call this a mature, responsible approach to a profitable business transaction. As a lifelong student of human folly, I call it funny as hell.

Kudos to Goldman; kudos to Michael Moore. The film is ultimately entertainment, though of the genre that encourages viewers to think. Or is that the worrisome factor?

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
What happened to value production and voluntary trade of value for value? [276 words]Leslie G HarperNov 19, 2009 15:35
Capitalism: The New God [159 words]Jill BarracloughNov 12, 2009 19:06
A comment ?
[w/response] [58 words]		dirkSep 26, 2009 17:01
An unrepentant Marxist take on Moore's movie [9 words]Louis ProyectSep 26, 2009 11:28
⇒ Sound investment for Goldman [78 words]SusanSep 25, 2009 10:05
Well Crafted? Maybe Not [98 words]RorySep 25, 2009 01:52
entertainment, nothing more [43 words]jedSep 24, 2009 23:16

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Sound investment for Goldman by Susan

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.