Bad attitude by WSJ editors

Reader comment on: Where Bloomberg Was

Submitted by John Gillis (United States), Dec 22, 2019 17:31

I'm no fan of Bloomberg, but the WSJ's Gigot and company show their sleazy bias against highly successful entrepreneurs by sneering, via their fantasy of what Bloomberg's life is like at home. Who knows if Bloomberg is even a drinker, but what does it matter whether he drinks a bottle at $9 or $9000.? They should be addressing his ideas and policies (most of which I find very bad) and not doing an ad hominem attack. The FoC editor is correct that the WSJ should be focusing on such matters as his charter school efforts, which are one of his better qualities.


Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Bad attitude by WSJ editors by John Gillis

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.