Paul Gigot

Reader comment on: The Wall Street Journal Versus Fairholme
in response to reader comment: WSJ Editorials

Submitted by Dan Calabria (United States), Aug 11, 2011 12:55

Sorry Ira, we'll have to agree to disagree.

I too was a Gigot admirer for many years. However, it seems to me that this might be the beginning of a change in the editorial direction. And we sure as hell don't need any more RINOs at the WSJ.

Point? The ridiculous "hobbits" nonsense (quickly picked up by John McCain, arguably the single person most responsible for the Obama regime) was way over the line and completely unnecessary.

And the S&P downgrade proved the tea party supported candidates deserved praise for their efforts not ridicule and scorn. BTW, that downgrade was a long time in the making.

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
WSJ Editorials
[w/response] [13 words]		Dan CalabriaAug 10, 2011 21:41
↔ ⇒ Paul Gigot [106 words]Dan CalabriaAug 11, 2011 12:55
WSJ weird editorial positions [26 words]Dan CalabriaAug 10, 2011 21:25

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Paul Gigot by Dan Calabria

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.