|
||||||||||||||||
And the conclusion is ...?Reader comment on: Capital Is Mobile Submitted by Cristian (United States), Feb 8, 2010 15:09 I am getting the sense that you are suggesting that states should be a lot more accommodating with the "high-flyers". Such a policy has already proven where it would lead: see corporate tax and Delaware and the hodge-podge of special exemptions that each state has given to a business or other to bring them in or keep them in. An accommodating policy is essentially a race to the bottom and would put states in the same situation financial institutions are today: offering increasingly ridiculous compensations to "high value" individuals that at best will stay with them for a couple of years. Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing. Other reader comments on this item
Comment on this item |
Subscribe to the Mailing List Enter your email address: ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT For your Las Vegas Travel needs visit Best of Vegas. For the best prices on Orlando Theme Parks visit Best of Orlando. |
|||||||||||||||
|
© 2012 FutureOfCapitalism, LLC. home | archives | about | mailing list | how to help | FoC @ facebook | FoC @ twitter | terms of use | privacy policy |
||||||||||||||||