One of Ira Stoll's Most Brilliant Articles: Highly Recommended

Reader comment on: Ronald Lauder's Taxes and the Sulzberger Family's

Submitted by Belladonna Rogers (United States), Nov 28, 2011 18:10

Thank you for taking down the Times' egregious "reporting."

I try to avoid reading that quondam newspaper -- now not good enough to line a litter box -- but I did read the Lauder piece because of my admiration for him, the work he's done and the causes he supports. I was outraged, of course, and congratulate you for responding as brilliantly as you did, Mr. Stoll.

The vast world of slanted journalism would have a much easier time without you, which is why your admirers fervently applaud when you go after the dishonesty and evil that permeates The New York Times daily and on Sundays, and 24/7 online.

Kudos, plaudits. and many thanks.


Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
Why did the NYT goes after Lauder [88 words]Concerned citizenNov 30, 2011 09:26
⇒ One of Ira Stoll's Most Brilliant Articles: Highly Recommended [114 words]Belladonna RogersNov 28, 2011 18:10
Only one antidote to the NYT [22 words]Michael GreenbergNov 28, 2011 19:42

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to One of Ira Stoll's Most Brilliant Articles: Highly Recommended by Belladonna Rogers

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.