|
||||||||||||||||
Better Taxes to Stimulate Economic GrowthReader comment on: Bush Institute 4 Percent Growth Conference Submitted by Eugene Patrick Devany (United States), Apr 12, 2012 11:20 To illustrate the range of flat tax rates needed to generate $2.6 trillion consider some different combinations of one, two or three tax bases: It is reasonable to ask why net wealth has not generally been taxed in the United States. After all in biblical times, wealth was the measure of taxation but an honest taxman was hard to find. For over 100 years wealth taxes have been levied in more than a dozen countries against only the very rich – creating complaints of both unfairness and burdensome paperwork. In the United States constitutional issues had been raised long ago about whether wealth tax rates would have to be apportioned among the states or simply taxed as part of a deferred computation of income (like capital gains). Today, for the first time in history, computers and internet databases have enabled the efficient implementation of a simple and fair net wealth tax for rich and poor. This technical advancement of the information age may have eluded the handful of liberal attorneys, sociologists and economists that periodically publicize suggestions to tax only the wealth of multimillionaires (on top of already progressive income tax rates). This tax-only-the-rich mentality is awful and undermines capitalism. The ill-considered soak-the-rich suggestions have also led to many intelligent professionals dismissing consideration of any wealth tax out-of-hand (almost as if the great and powerful, Grover Norquist, might personally add their name to the official wall of traitors should a new tax idea enter their mind, pass their lips and establish the high crime of conspiracy to "feed the beast"). Advantages of individual tax reform using both wealth and lower income tax rates include: Advantages of business tax reform using both VAT and lower income tax rates include: The rates of the 2-4-8 Tax Blend also make it easy to quickly estimate the tax that would be owed for any individual or business. There is no good reason you should settle for incremental reform. Eugene Patrick Devany, JD, MPA Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing. Other reader comments on this item
Comment on this item |
Subscribe to the Mailing List ADVERTISEMENT |
|||||||||||||||
|
© 2013 FutureOfCapitalism, LLC. home | archives | about | mailing list | how to help | FoC @ facebook | FoC @ twitter | terms of use | privacy policy news transparency | smartertimes |
||||||||||||||||