Eye-popping

Reader comment on: The Times' Quintuple Standard

Submitted by John Gillis (United States), Aug 17, 2012 17:21

Despite my skeptical view of anything the NYTimes writes in their editorial (or news) section, the FoC editor's analysis here is eye-popping (which is not a good thing.)

All the examples martialed here show a hypocrisy that knows no bounds. Thanks -- I guess -- for a view into the cesspool of the minds of the Times editors.

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title	By	Date
Quintuple standard? [66 words]	David Gerstman	Aug 20, 2012 12:11
why omit Corzine? [29 words]	don baker	Aug 18, 2012 09:05
The game [161 words]	Josh S	Aug 18, 2012 08:56
NY Times is Garbage [23 words]	FrancisChalk	Aug 18, 2012 08:54
Fines! [31 words]	Cindy Munford	Aug 18, 2012 08:38
How about...... [12 words]	KLH	Aug 18, 2012 08:23
Jon Corzine [15 words]	Paul Raven	Aug 18, 2012 08:14
⇒ Eye-popping [58 words]	John Gillis	Aug 17, 2012 17:21