Reader comment on: Money and State Judicial Elections
Submitted by Alan Vanneman (United States), Aug 16, 2010 12:11
The better argument would be that state judges should not be elected. If judges are elected, it's basically impossible to shut off the money flow. Public financing is a bad idea. But, really, we should be spending zero money on judicial elections, because we shouldn't be having them.
Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.
Comment on this item