Reader comment on: Taxing the Rich
Submitted by Fred Van Bennekom (Singapore), Apr 14, 2011 22:40
I think -- and I say *I think* -- the Journal number is the income *greater than $100,000* for all those who earned more than $100,000. In other words, their number would exclude (#filers AGI>$100,000 * $100,000).
Those of you with access to the data can verify for me. But it does bother me that the WSJ would choose a year that best suits their argument. Let's take the average of the past ten years or some moving average.
Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.
Other reader comments on this item
|⇒ Hazy Definitions [79 words]||Fred Van Bennekom||Apr 14, 2011 22:40|
|Refuting Who? [32 words]||Jerry Skurnik||Apr 14, 2011 17:20|
|Funny numbers [106 words]||ben||Apr 13, 2011 21:45|
Comment on this item