Yes, the first amendment is not qualified by motive

Reader comment on: Crovitz on Wikileaks and the NY Times

Submitted by Cynthia Gillis (United States), Apr 25, 2011 17:29

When I read the Crovitz article in the Wall Street Journal I was troubled (appalled actually) but did not take the time to articulate my concerns. Ira Stoll has done it for me, and as usual, done it very well. Thanks you.

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Yes, the first amendment is not qualified by motive by Cynthia Gillis

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.