Dubious Refutation

Reader comment on: NPR on the Rich and State Tax Rates

Submitted by Peter (United States), May 5, 2011 14:00

I am a supporter of Austrian Economics and the free market but always read articles with a skeptical eye even if they conform with my outlook.

"First, NPR doesn't even get the date of the New Jersey tax increase correct; it was 2004, not 1994. Second, maybe the two groups moved at the same rates because the $400,000-a-year earners were optimists who expected to be making $500,000 a year pretty soon, so their decisions turned out pretty much the same as the $500,000-and-up crowd."

They got the date wrong and "maybe" the 400k earners were optimistic. The latter is pure conjecture and not worthy of a critical piece, can't we have a more substantive argument?


Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

The Future of Capitalism replies:

If you read on you get to the key point, which is that NPR left out the key sentences of one of the studies.

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
⇒ Dubious Refutation
[w/response] [115 words]
PeterMay 5, 2011 14:00
AAAAH
[w/response] [59 words]
benApr 29, 2011 09:53
What about the facts and statistics in the article.
[w/response] [324 words]
benApr 29, 2011 17:58
I trust you on the journalism piece
[w/response] [235 words]
benApr 30, 2011 21:18

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Dubious Refutation by Peter

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.