ImmigrationReader comment on: Obama's Immigration Angle Submitted by Fast Eddie (United States), Oct 20, 2011 11:32 I hope the Politico story is correct. Immigration has become, like Social Security, a third-rail in politics. There will be no 'comprehensive' immigration legislation because 'comprehensive' is a code word for giving amnesty to the 12 million illegals already here and the majority of voters oppose it. Indeed, some polls even show a majority of legal immigrants opposing amnesty for their illegal brethen. Immigration reform cannot happen without Republican support and Republican voters learned their lesson when Reagan, in 1986, gave amnesty to 3 million illegals in exchange for closing the borders to further illegals, which, of course, never happened. Even McCain, once a strong supporter of amnesty, is now against it until the border is closed to illegals. All of the legislation in coming years will be at the state level, with states enacting laws that make life uncomfortable for anyone here illegally. Irrespective of court challenges funded by immigrant groups, the courts won't be able to hold back the tide at the state level of anti-illegal laws. If Obama is silly enough to push for laws favorable to illegals he will only add to the reasons for people to vote against him. He's made a mess of everything else he's touched, so why not immigration ! What he should be doing is pushing for much higher quotas for legal immigrants with advanced degrees in engineering and the sciences who have become essential to the growth of the high tech industry. Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing. Other reader comments on this item
Comment on this item |
ADVERTISEMENT |