Defining Intent

Reader comment on: The Times Shell Game

Submitted by Dan Calabria (United States), Dec 20, 2011 19:31

Rather than "hypocrisy," a strong case can be made, based on the fundamental changes in the classification of "independent contractor" vs. employee, that this is more appropriately described as fraud.

The SEC has cited public companies for fraud for doing far less.

But of course the NY Times would never engage in fraudulent practices.

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
NY Times Hpocritically IC'ing Workforce [249 words]Geo DowleyDec 20, 2011 20:03
⇒ Defining Intent [54 words]Dan CalabriaDec 20, 2011 19:31
Defining "Independent Contractors" [45 words]BenDec 20, 2011 11:59
You don't pay unemployment for contractors, nor the employers share of FICA [51 words]LyleDec 19, 2011 21:44

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Defining Intent by Dan Calabria

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.