Stumbled across this garbage.
Reader comment on: The Berkshire-Buffett Bailout
Submitted by Anthony (United States), Aug 8, 2012 23:53
What is the point to this article? It looks like it was written by a seventh grader who cut and paste gibberish from various websites. Just because Mr. Buffet happens to own stock in some companies that took bailout money doesn't mean he was the beneficiary of the bailout. If have a 401k that is diversified or a mutual fund, you probably also own some stock in a company that took bailout money. Your logic is flawed and makes no sense. Berkshire Hathway was one of the few companies that actually had plenty of cash when the market crashed. They were the last ones to need any sort of bail out. Looks to me like they were the ones bailing people out if anything.
Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.
Other reader comments on this item
Comment on this item