Eye-popping

Reader comment on: The Times' Quintuple Standard

Submitted by John Gillis (United States), Aug 17, 2012 17:21

Despite my skeptical view of anything the NYTimes writes in their editorial (or news) section, the FoC editor's analysis here is eye-popping (which is not a good thing.)

All the examples martialed here show a hypocrisy that knows no bounds. Thanks -- I guess -- for a view into the cesspool of the minds of the Times editors.

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
Quintuple standard? [66 words]David GerstmanAug 20, 2012 12:11
why omit Corzine? [29 words]don bakerAug 18, 2012 09:05
The game [161 words]Josh SAug 18, 2012 08:56
NY Times is Garbage [23 words]FrancisChalkAug 18, 2012 08:54
Fines! [31 words]Cindy MunfordAug 18, 2012 08:38
How about...... [12 words]KLHAug 18, 2012 08:23
Jon Corzine [15 words]Paul RavenAug 18, 2012 08:14
⇒ Eye-popping [58 words]John GillisAug 17, 2012 17:21

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Eye-popping by John Gillis

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.