Engaging the President of Bowdoin

Reader comment on: Bias at Bowdoin

Submitted by Robert Jackson (United States), Apr 7, 2013 19:25

It seems to me that Barry Mills is at the cusp of the problem and is even asking for help in moving toward the goal of a college that better reflects America. So why not engage him in the very points that were made in the article rather than attacking him for his positions and even for his attacks. The blindspots that he reflected - such as the Summers' affair - need to be engaged in respectful discussions, rather than making points. He seems to be an ideal person for breaking the ice and it is likely that other college presidents would follow. The approach would have to be incremental, as in one suggestion in the Klingenstein report - to bring in a course on American History. The effort cannot be seen as a we-they competition, but as a joint effort to bring real diversity. The radicals will scream, but I suspect enough faculty and alumni will support Mills.

On a semantic matter, I am against the use of the word "liberal" for what are clearly leftist opinions, since liberal implies people who are willing to freely think about issues and analyze them.

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
Bowdoin atrocities [60 words]Herman KaufmanApr 7, 2013 20:22
⇒ Engaging the President of Bowdoin [193 words]Robert JacksonApr 7, 2013 19:25
Where are today's conservative activists? [32 words]Michael GreenbergApr 10, 2013 17:53
This report is hardly "lovely" - and not accurate or detailed enough to be a case study [37 words]Alex WilliamsApr 7, 2013 16:42

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Engaging the President of Bowdoin by Robert Jackson

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.