Safety net--at whose expense?
Reader comment on: Disability Nation
Submitted by Harry Binswanger (United States), May 17, 2013 20:15
None of this is to say that . . .there shouldn't be a government-provided safety net
Okay, but separately, I hope you agree that a government-provided safety net is immoral. "Government provided" means: "forcibly looted from someone."
Anyone who wants to engage in charitable endeavors is free to do so. Just don't point a gun at the head of others and make them pay for it.
Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.
Submit a comment on this article
Other reader comments on this item
Comment on this item