Is this lame proposal a step forward?
Reader comment on: Rubio's Anti-Poverty Plan
Submitted by Harry Binswanger (United States), Jan 11, 2014 12:57
The answer to federal statism is not local statism. The answer is freedom.
But could Rubio's proposal be a tiny step in that direction? Would states, under his proposal (and in the total context of cultural attitudes today) be able to elect to have LESS anti-poverty measures, LESS regulation, and LESS taxation? Or would the Flex Funds mean no state could turn off the federal spigot?
Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.
Comment on this item