Sam is confused

Reader comment on: Patagonia's Corporate Political Speech
in response to reader comment: Corporate speech is not the problem

Submitted by BW1 (United States), Dec 29, 2017 01:36

Sam, the issue here is the left's criticism of Citizens United, a decision which had nothing to do with giving money to politicians. It specifically protected the right of a non-profit organization to publish material critical of a candidate, exactly what Patagonia did.

But hey, don't let the facts get in the way of your narrative


Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
Don't be so sure [40 words]LexDec 7, 2017 10:04
Corporate speech is not the problem [25 words]SamDec 7, 2017 09:38
⇒ Sam is confused [56 words]BW1Dec 29, 2017 01:36
Title [22 words]BobKDec 7, 2017 09:15
Did the property revert to whoever lost it? [61 words]JamesBDec 5, 2017 20:52

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Sam is confused by BW1

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.