FBI leaking

Reader comment on: Rob Porter and the FBI

Submitted by Forbes (United States), Feb 10, 2018 12:21

FBI as the source of the Porter story is most plausible. So-called reporters are merely the conduit for such leaks to become stories. Why would the Daily Mail be interested in some WH functionary that no one outside of DC heard of before last week? DM operates as scandal-outrage machine trolling for viewers--it's in the entertainment business. Porter's personal life is not news. His two divorces might be unfortunate, even ugly and highly contentious, but if someone's homosexuality shouldn't be considered a reason to deny security clearance (potential for extortion), then why should Porter's embarrassing marital history...

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
⇒ FBI leaking [97 words]ForbesFeb 10, 2018 12:21
Payback [92 words]P.N. MarcusFeb 10, 2018 12:03
We could check [51 words]SDNFeb 10, 2018 08:47
yes so why are Strzok and Page not fired by FBI [40 words]carl stritterFeb 10, 2018 08:45
Mark Felt [14 words]Mike_KFeb 10, 2018 08:22
Counterintelligence failure [43 words]MikeFeb 10, 2018 07:24
Top Men [33 words]Mr. FeverheadFeb 10, 2018 07:24

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to FBI leaking by Forbes

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.