May 7, 2010 at 8:39 am
A Clinton administration Commerce Department official, David Rothkopf, writes in the Financial Times: Legislators seem to be competing to offer the most draconian new regulatory measures or to appear the most implacable in the search for malfeasance on the part of business. There are ironic echoes of a prior administration in which out-of-shape pols who had never commanded troops in battle liked nothing better than sending soldiers off to war – except that today it is out-of-shape pols who have never run a business slapping around chief executives and telling them how to manage their companies.
Submit a Comment
May 7, 2010 at 8:34 am
From a column by Samuel Brittan in this morning's Financial Times: "To start with, 'market fundamentalism', which had no real existence outside North America, is now well and truly dead....Almost no one would claim that the pattern of rewards resulting from market transactions and inherited property rights is a just one." Funny how the one country that emerged as the world's leading economy was the one where "market fundamentalism" supposedly existed. And has the FT forgotten Margaret Thatcher? As we've said before, the critics of "market fundamentalism" almost always have fundamental beliefs of their own, which they are often less than clear in articulating.
Submit a Comment
May 7, 2010 at 8:00 am
The crisis in Greece is fueling concern about the value of the dollar. Three pieces out this morning make related points. Larry Kudlow writes, "The real winner yesterday? Gold. It's up about $25, to $1,200. People want real money. They do not trust the debt-laden currencies of Europe and the United States. Or, for that matter, Japan. Gold is fast becoming, once again, a reserve currency of choice." A New York Sun editorial (yes, despite ceasing print publication, the paper is still issuing editorials on its Web site and posting other content there), says:
Continue Reading
May 6, 2010 at 9:46 pm
Voters in the Martha's Vineyard town of Oak Bluffs recently rejected, by a 172-102 vote, a proposed 2% tax increase on hotel rooms, and also voted down a proposed 3% raise for the town clerk, keeping his salary at $74,360 instead of the suggested $76,590, the Martha's Vineyard Times reports. Shortly thereafter, voters in the neighboring Martha's Vineyard town of Tisbury, also known as Vineyard Haven, voted 934 to 606 to reject a tax increase proposed to fund a $225,000 increase to police pay, the Martha's Vineyard Gazette reports. When supermajorities on the liberal, Democratic island of Martha's Vineyard are voting down tax increases that would fund pay increases for public employees, there's something really happening in this country.
1 Reader Comment
May 6, 2010 at 9:30 pm
The Martha's Vineyard Times has an 1100-word article on an island resident who received a "treasured" handwritten note from Warren Buffett.
1 Reader Comment
May 6, 2010 at 4:50 pm
Probably not many people were watching because of all the Greece and stock-market drama, but this afternoon, the congressionally created Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission heard from representatives of Pimco, State Street, and GE Capital. Pimco's Bill Gross, unlike Lloyd Blankfein, got away with sending an underling to testify. A Pimco managing director, Paul McCulley, boasted that in 2005, sensing a bubble in the housing market, his firm sent teams "on the ground" to 20 American cities for what he called old-fashioned, shoe-leather research that involved interviewing mortgage brokers and real estate agents. One of the members of the commission then acutely asked, if Pimco's shoe-leather research was so good, what was it doing holding all that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac debt during the financial crisis. Mr. McCulley could barely avoid a smirk as he replied, "We fully expected that our government, if push comes to shove, would wrap its arms around Fannie and Freddie. And that's precisely what happened."
1 Reader Comment
May 6, 2010 at 2:48 pm
"The markets have probably over-reacted to the oil spill: the fact that BP's shares have lost $30 billion in value, three times the likely cost of the clean-up, suggests that they will start to climb back," the Economist writes.
Submit a Comment
May 6, 2010 at 11:13 am
Rassmussen has two polls. One says that overall support for offshore oil drilling is down to 58%, from 72%, on news of the Gulf of Mexico spill. The second says that in Florida, 48% of voters now favor offshore oil drilling, while 35% are opposed.
Submit a Comment
May 6, 2010 at 10:26 am
The New York Times's news article on the Washington Post Company's decision to put Newsweek up for sale -- "Newsweeklies Lose Influence," is how the Times Web headline interprets the news -- reports, "Both also lowered the circulation guaranteed to advertisers: Time guarantees a 3.25 million circulation, and Newsweek just 1.5 million."
Some editor should have deleted the word "just." After all, 1.5 million, even though it's less than Time and less than Newsweek was back in the day, and even though some of it may be "soft," is still a totally respectable paid circulation.
The New York Times's daily circulation was 951,063, according to the latest quarterly audit numbers, or "just" 951,063, if one wanted to be derisive about it.
Continue Reading
May 6, 2010 at 9:49 am
The Wall Street Journal doesn't say where the idea came from for its article today on the news that the SEC is "examining" the disclosures made by Warren Buffett-led Berkshire Hathaway in connection with buying the rest of the Burlington, Northern, and Santa Fe Railroad. But it certainly crossed my mind that the SEC was ticked off at Mr. Buffett for defending Goldman Sachs over the weekend at the Berkshire annual meeting, and retaliated by leaking the news of this investigation to the Journal. Or maybe it's just a coincidence that, while the SEC has been looking at Berkshire "for a number of weeks," the news just surfaced publicly today. At a certain point you wonder how many of these sorts of situations Mr. Buffett can weather while still maintaining his Main Street grandfatherly image.
Submit a Comment
May 6, 2010 at 9:20 am
Another good column today from Daniel Henninger in the Wall Street Journal: It works like this: If you occupy a position of leadership or responsibility in public or private life, your thought process in the face of disaster now runs rationally in this order: 1) Am I going to get blamed for this? 2) Is there anything we can do to help? 3) Will we get tagged if something goes wrong with that effort? The answer of course to (1) and (3) is that you will get blamed for days on end, no matter what the facts are. If under some ancient compulsion of honor you admit some culpability, the plaintiffs lawyers will pillage your assets, and a political-media bonfire will burn down what's left of your reputation. Why go there? In the pin-the-tale-on-the-donkey world we occupy now, the political and legal price of taking ownership is too high.
He's writing about President Obama and the oil spill, but he could just as easily be writing about Lloyd Blankfein and Goldman Sachs.
Continue Reading
May 6, 2010 at 8:52 am
The executive director of the Sierra Club, Michael Brune, has an op-ed piece in Bloomberg News that appears under the headline "Halt U.S. Offshore Drilling After Oil Spill." He writes, "There is no safe way to drill for oil in oceans." He sounds like the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, and his argument has the same problems.
Submit a Comment
May 6, 2010 at 8:32 am
We wrote here (February 2) and here (February 10) about how Greece's high tax rates got it in trouble. Now Larry Kudlow weighs in: "while Greece and Spain have moderate 30 percent business tax rates, lower than rates in the U.S., their combined personal and VAT tax rates come to about 60 percent. Team Obama take note: These are anti-growth tax policies."
Submit a Comment
May 5, 2010 at 3:36 pm
An Associated Press dispatch on the Washington Post Company putting Newsweek up for sale paraphrases the chairman of the Washington Post Co., Donald Graham, as saying, that he "hopes a buyer with more resources will be able to get the magazine back to profitability."
More resources? The Washington Post Company has a market capitalization of about $4.6 billion, cash on hand of $862 million, and pays a $9 a share annual dividend, according to Yahoo! Finance. The company's directors include, in Warren Buffett and Melinda French Gates, representatives of two of the two richest families in America. How much "more" resources would be required to get Newsweek to profitability, and don't you kind of think that if it were possible to do at a reasonable return on investment, Donald Graham would have already done it?
Continue Reading
May 5, 2010 at 7:00 am
The Wall Street Journal reports that a move is afoot to bring Henry Paulson back to Goldman Sachs as chairman: "One camp is pressing for Goldman's board to bring back Mr. Paulson as chairman. While such a move might help restore confidence, it also could undermine Mr. Paulson's legacy as Treasury secretary during the financial crisis and fuel longstanding criticism that Goldman is a revolving door between Wall Street and Washington." We've made the case here that Mr. Paulson's legacy as Treasury secretary was basically a disaster, so it's hard to see how bringing him to Goldman would either restore confidence in Goldman or undermine his "legacy." But the Wall Street Journal, or those pushing for Mr. Paulson's return to Goldman, clearly are peddling a different narrative.
2 Reader Comments
<- Prev 15 items | Next 15 items ->
|