Nobel Prize for peace was always controversial

Reader comment on: Obama's Nobel

Submitted by Gya.Pok (United States), Oct 9, 2009 17:39

Nobel Prize for peace was always controversial. Dalai Lama, San Sui of Burma, Jimmy Carter, Mandela to Obama. It neither goes to extreme left, nor to extreme right. It is always given to defuse the monopoly of either extreme (e.g. Carter and Obama), and Dalai Lama to embarrass the Red Communists. The extreme side always feels it betrayed. In US, Republicans today feel it betrayed. Republicans looking for smart (small govt, less govt. expenditure) government spent huge chunk of money just to settle Son Bush settling unbalanced account that his father left with Saddam Hussain. I feel sorry for Republicans.

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
⇒ Nobel Prize for peace was always controversial [100 words]Gya.PokOct 9, 2009 17:39
Such a waste... [176 words]RanOct 9, 2009 12:26

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Nobel Prize for peace was always controversial by Gya.Pok

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.