Coastal property...

Submitted by newscaper (United States), Nov 30, 2009 15:09

The rest of us should subsidize your risky-in-the-first-place beach front vacation property against total loss if the sea level rises a couple feet.

Why?

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

The Future of Capitalism replies:

I don't think you should, I'm just disclosing an interest in it happening. What's best for me isn't necessarily what's best for society as a whole.

Other reader comments on this item

Title	By	Date
Climate Gate [125 words]	Quinn Woodworth	Dec 1, 2009 14:16
"Heed My Opinion!" vs. "Look At What I Found!" [210 words]	bobby b	Nov 30, 2009 15:41
then whats the point of this site? [60 words]	Fen	Nov 30, 2009 15:37
apples and oranges [102 words]	Jeff	Nov 30, 2009 15:35
Why is it different? [56 words]	scott	Nov 30, 2009 15:31
Tit for tat [57 words]	agesilaus	Nov 30, 2009 15:13
⇒ Coastal property... [w/response] [24 words]	newscaper	Nov 30, 2009 15:09
Questions [65 words]	BillW	Nov 30, 2009 15:04
Whistleblowing is different than stealing or trespassing [108 words]	Independent	Nov 30, 2009 15:03
All secrets are not the same [109 words]	Shannon Love	Nov 30, 2009 14:53
caution in revolutions [53 words]	Michael Kennedy	Nov 30, 2009 14:47

Subscribe to the Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Follow Us On:

Newest

Most Viewed

For your Las Vegas Travel needs visit Best of Vegas.

For the best prices on Orlando Theme Parks visit Best of Orlando.

Most Mailed