Climate Gate

Submitted by Quinn Woodworth (United States), Dec 1, 2009 14:16

1) Those who broke the law to expose the warming "scientists" fudging (deceptions) the facts may be criminals. However, their "crime" certainly is of a lesser one than those individuals who falsely claim we are headed for disaster. Besides, who does the information belong to? The "research" was funded by tax dollars and is public property, the information is unclassified, and every citizen has a right to it under the Freedom of Information acts. I understand that some climate skeptics did request data, but the "researchers" conspired to withhold it.

Some believe that those individuals who hacked the computers and took the emails have the same more and legal status as a SWAT team that forcibly breaks into a house to rescue a kidnapping victim.

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title	By	Date
⇒ Climate Gate [125 words]	Quinn Woodworth	Dec 1, 2009 14:16
"Heed My Opinion!" vs. "Look At What I Found!" [210 words]	bobby b	Nov 30, 2009 15:41
then whats the point of this site? [60 words]	Fen	Nov 30, 2009
apples and oranges [102 words]	Jeff	Nov 30, 2009
Why is it different? [56 words]	scott	Nov 30, 2009
Tit for tat [57 words]	agesilaus	Nov 30, 2009
Coastal property... [w/response] [24 words]	newscaper	Nov 30, 2009
Questions [65 words]	BillW	Nov 30, 2009
Whistleblowing is different than stealing or trespassing [108 words]	Independent	Nov 30, 2009
All secrets are not the same [109 words]	Shannon Love	Nov 30, 2009
caution in revolutions [53 words]	Michael Kennedy	Nov 30, 2009

Comment on this item

Subscribe to the Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Follow Us On:

RSS Twitter Facebook

Newest

Most Viewed

Most Mailed