Packer sticks to his guns

Reader comment on: The New Civility

Submitted by Andrew (United States), Apr 19, 2011 14:07

I went to the New Yorker's on-line forum with Mr. Packer on this article. Here's my question and his response:

Comment From Andrew

Was it really necessary to use the term "legislative terrorism" in your article? Does that really add to the debate?

George Packer:

I thought about that phrase a few times before leaving it in. Probably not the best part of the piece, but when core interests of the country are up for grabs in every negotiation, I don't think one should shy away from strong language.

So, I guess when it's "core interests", anything goes. Remember that.

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
⇒ Packer sticks to his guns [100 words]AndrewApr 19, 2011 14:07
Courage and convictions [55 words]John GillisApr 18, 2011 17:49

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Packer sticks to his guns by Andrew

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.