Contradiction indeedReader comment on: Sowell and Stengel on the Constitution Submitted by Harry Binswanger (United States), Jun 29, 2011 10:14 RichH is right. The "necessary and proper" clause is the limitation Stengel denies. The first thing the "loose constructionists" did was to distort the meaning of "necessary and proper" to be "convenient and vote-getting." Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing. Other reader comments on this item
Comment on this item |
ADVERTISEMENT |