Damned if they do, damned if they don't
Reader comment on: The New York Times Discovers the Boy Scouts
Submitted by Yo (United States), Aug 6, 2010 12:34
Let's see: An organization specifically for adolescent boys is by its nature a pederast magnet. The Scouts recently got hit with an $18,500,000 judgment for a sexual abuse case. The Scouts are terrible people because they ban gays.
The Scouts aren't your version of perfect, therefore you can either not participate, or you can attack them in the courts and the legislatures and in every organization which allows them to use their facilities.
Which do the apostles of diversity and tolerance choose?
Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.
Submit a comment on this article
Other reader comments on this item
Comment on this item