Damned if they do, damned if they don't

Reader comment on: The New York Times Discovers the Boy Scouts

Submitted by Yo (United States), Aug 6, 2010 12:34

Let's see: An organization specifically for adolescent boys is by its nature a pederast magnet. The Scouts recently got hit with an $18,500,000 judgment for a sexual abuse case. The Scouts are terrible people because they ban gays.

The Scouts aren't your version of perfect, therefore you can either not participate, or you can attack them in the courts and the legislatures and in every organization which allows them to use their facilities.

Which do the apostles of diversity and tolerance choose?

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
⇒ Damned if they do, damned if they don't [82 words]YoAug 6, 2010 12:34
nice shot at the Catholic church [8 words]JasonAug 1, 2010 17:30
not accurate [37 words]clsAug 1, 2010 15:40
Biased review of an objective article [365 words]Joseph T. BerlantAug 1, 2010 10:51
Needs to do research before commenting [142 words]JeffAug 1, 2010 09:25
Blah...blah...blah.... [158 words]KepplerAug 1, 2010 01:14

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Damned if they do, damned if they don't by Yo

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.