All secrets are not the same

Reader comment on: Crovitz on Anonymity

Submitted by Shannon Love (United States), Nov 30, 2009 14:53

I think you're missing the difference between a secret that is a standardized and accepted practice and secret that is wildly exceptional. Peer review is institutionally a secret process. The secret of the identity of the person who made CRU's illegal and deceptive acts public is a wild exception.

There is likewise a vast difference between powerful agents of the state who break the law and establish a huge and dangerous precedent in doing so as compared to a private individual who carries out one isolated act.

I find it more than a little disturbing that you can't see the vast difference in scale between the acts you compare.


Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
Climate Gate [125 words]Quinn WoodworthDec 1, 2009 14:16
"Heed My Opinion!" vs. "Look At What I Found!" [210 words]bobby bNov 30, 2009 15:41
then whats the point of this site? [60 words]FenNov 30, 2009 15:37
apples and oranges [102 words]JeffNov 30, 2009 15:35
Why is it different? [56 words]scottNov 30, 2009 15:31
Tit for tat [57 words]agesilausNov 30, 2009 15:13
Coastal property...
[w/response] [24 words]
newscaperNov 30, 2009 15:09
Questions [65 words]BillWNov 30, 2009 15:04
Whistleblowing is different than stealing or trespassing [108 words]IndependentNov 30, 2009 15:03
⇒ All secrets are not the same [109 words]Shannon LoveNov 30, 2009 14:53
caution in revolutions [53 words]Michael KennedyNov 30, 2009 14:47

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to All secrets are not the same by Shannon Love

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.