The same issue applied to Wal-Mart and Chicago

Reader comment on: Catsimatidis Versus Walmart

Submitted by Lyle (United States), Jan 12, 2011 21:49

They wanted to build a store on the south side, but folks objected there. In this case it's a desire for protection, which all business really wants, to be protected from their competitors. If you can't provide a service at a price as good as the competition, you want the government to step in and protect you. The issue is that smaller merchants can't compete on price and do not provide good enough service to make up for it.

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
Huge retailer [59 words]DavidJan 13, 2011 09:38
Has Mr. Catsimatidis Ever Shopped at Walmart? Or Seen One With His Own Eyes? [476 words]Belladonna RogersJan 13, 2011 00:04
⇒ The same issue applied to Wal-Mart and Chicago [79 words]LyleJan 12, 2011 21:49

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to The same issue applied to Wal-Mart and Chicago by Lyle

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.