While it is within the companies rights it was stupid.

Reader comment on: The Times and H & M's Old Clothes

Submitted by Lyle (United States), Jan 7, 2010 17:57

If the label is an exculsive label (which it must be to not remainder the clothes) cut the labels off, and put a use and care label only, no brand label, then you could reminder it at remainder shops and get a little out of the overages. Alternatively if the company felt charitable give the clothes to the Salvation Army. Without the label it will just be in the style of ...

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
H&M Castoffs [147 words]CarolineJan 8, 2010 10:52
⇒ While it is within the companies rights it was stupid. [72 words]LyleJan 7, 2010 17:57
Times and NJ [28 words]John DowdJan 6, 2010 11:26
Not the same as newsstands
[w/response] [60 words]		Cinco JotasJan 6, 2010 11:08

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to While it is within the companies rights it was stupid. by Lyle

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.