Contradiction indeed

Reader comment on: Sowell and Stengel on the Constitution
in response to reader comment: Contradiction

Submitted by Harry Binswanger (United States), Jun 29, 2011 10:14

RichH is right. The "necessary and proper" clause is the limitation Stengel denies. The first thing the "loose constructionists" did was to distort the meaning of "necessary and proper" to be "convenient and vote-getting."

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
The 9th Amendment and rights [104 words]Harry BinswangerJun 28, 2011 23:47
Contradiction [59 words]RichHJun 28, 2011 20:02
↔ ⇒ Contradiction indeed [34 words]Harry BinswangerJun 29, 2011 10:14
Sowell vs. Stengel [10 words]ChrisCJun 28, 2011 13:55

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Contradiction indeed by Harry Binswanger

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.