Studies show that fructose is as bad as booze for the body.

Reader comment on: FutureOfCapitalism on TV

Submitted by Lyle (United States), Mar 24, 2010 17:31

We tax booze as a sin tax, clearly over all we need more revenue why not a sin tax on sugar beverages? Or would you rather have an income tax hike? Just like I believe we should legalize all drugs that do not make one violent directly (that is no crystal meth) but Weed and opiates and cocaine and then tax them. It worked to tamp down crime after the 20s so why not try it with drugs now?


Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

The Future of Capitalism replies:

I don't agree that NY State needs more tax revenue. It consistently is in the top two in the Tax Foundation's annual survey of highest state-local tax burdens. People are moving out of the state to lower tax destinations like Fla. and Conn.

If proposal was to cut other taxes (income, sales) by amount of sugary drink tax then I would be more open to it.

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
Extra time?!? [309 words]benjamin GeballeMar 24, 2010 23:27
Please, a few facts to back up these assertions. . .
[w/response] [212 words]
benjamin GeballeMar 24, 2010 21:41
Corrupt politicians
[w/response] [116 words]
benjamin GeballeMar 24, 2010 20:19
⇒ Studies show that fructose is as bad as booze for the body.
[w/response] [79 words]
LyleMar 24, 2010 17:31

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Studies show that fructose is as bad as booze for the body. by Lyle

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.