Incomplete reasoning

Reader comment on: Jonathan Turley on Obama's Lawlessness

Submitted by StuporDave (United States), Feb 28, 2014 23:05

Had not Republicans expressed their open hatred of a thoughtful, intelligent black man in the White House (not a butler) on day one of his first term, I would concede Turley's argument. However, in light of the typical ego of a politician, it's important to note that Obama would not be true to his beliefs if he acquiesced to House demands that he become a Republican, for all intents and purposes, leaving only navigating around Congress as a way to avoid being accused of fiddling while Rome burns, which Republicans would surely do if he let them have their way.

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
⇒ Incomplete reasoning [100 words]StuporDaveFeb 28, 2014 23:05
Are Obama's executive orders "ignoring the Constitution"? [51 words]Tibor R. MachanFeb 28, 2014 19:01
Both the Supreme Court Judges and the President are Immune [139 words]Eugene Patrick DevanyFeb 28, 2014 17:47
↔ President and Supreme Court immune [57 words]Jeff wMar 5, 2014 10:23
Totally agree [53 words]SteveFeb 28, 2014 12:06
in agreement whole heartedly with Professor Turley's comment [42 words]anitaFeb 28, 2014 05:59

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Incomplete reasoning by StuporDave

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.