Wait for the Faces of 'Victims'

Reader comment on: Wait for the Faces of 'Victims'

Submitted by sean (United States), Apr 20, 2010 01:10

Yet Paulson did not own the mortgages and had no ability to trigger their default. I agree with your point that had the mortgages remained with a local bank there would hvae been a much higher liklihood that they would not have defaulted, but i think without the securitization process there would have been about a 0% chance that the mortgage would have been originated in the first place.

As far as a plan goes to keep homeowners in their homes, very large tax cuts would have made a big difference in many but not all cases. Instead the administration chose to deal with the symptom, the bad assets on the banks books, by adding capital to the banks instead of the cause - defaults from declining incomes and job losses. Keep incomes up and people make payments and bank assets stay current and performing.


Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

The Future of Capitalism replies:

Paulson did, however, have the ability to pay lobbyists to block Congressional efforts to prevent foreclosures. More on that soon.

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
⇒ Wait for the Faces of 'Victims'
[w/response] [145 words]
seanApr 20, 2010 01:10
Now where are the incentives [118 words]benApr 19, 2010 13:43
Goldman counterparties [165 words]J.JohnsonApr 19, 2010 13:38
Well said [115 words]benApr 19, 2010 12:32

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Wait for the Faces of 'Victims' by sean

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.