Kochs support cancer research while shamelessly polluting the environment

Reader comment on: The New Yorker on David and Charles Koch

Submitted by LT (United States), Aug 28, 2010 20:02

It's amazing that these self-serving brothers can fund cancer research causes while flooding the environment with known carcinogens and fighting against government regulation.

How very sexist to portray Jane Meyer's intelligent piece as "breathless"--give me a break! If a man had written it, I guarantee you wouldn't have used that word. Talk about "trying to shape a reader's perception."


Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

The Future of Capitalism replies:

Your "guarantee" aside, here is a FutureOfCapitalism item in which I use the word "breathless" to refer to an article written by a man:

http://www.futureofcapitalism.com/2010/03/the-romanoff-sestak-scandal

Think or do your research before you accuse someone of sexism.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
The Kochs may be right [177 words]JoeApr 3, 2011 23:56
⇒ Kochs support cancer research while shamelessly polluting the environment
[w/response] [59 words]
LTAug 28, 2010 20:02
Interesting Omission by Stoll! [141 words]SteveAug 28, 2010 08:15
Excellent support of corporatism! [31 words]KaiAug 27, 2010 16:26
Political literacy please
[w/response] [48 words]
Ron KampeasAug 28, 2010 18:41
Coins have two sides [105 words]Peter BoyleAug 27, 2010 11:22
Your critique is boring [83 words]Bob JacobsonAug 26, 2010 21:33
10th Worst Polluters in America [127 words]P.J. NuhnAug 26, 2010 09:27
Re: 10th Worst Polluters in America
[w/response] [18 words]
PeepAug 26, 2010 14:29
Koch assistance Welcome in South Carolina [101 words]Timothy N. MoultrieAug 25, 2010 16:39
At least someone did their research [116 words]Peggy VenableAug 25, 2010 15:24
New Yorker piece badly researched [75 words]Eric CramptonAug 24, 2010 23:45
Stealth - yes
[w/response] [83 words]
JHAug 24, 2010 15:56
Center for Public Integrity is not left wing
[w/response] [133 words]
Randy BarrettAug 24, 2010 14:58
Is this what passes for journalism these days? [89 words]Carol SkaffAug 24, 2010 13:39
Not a dime yet, but we're hoping! [17 words]WildwillAug 23, 2010 16:49
Well said [47 words]TJohnsonAug 23, 2010 16:23
Mr. Stoll's bias is ridiculously evident in his criticism of Jane Mayer's New Yorker article on the Kochs
[w/response] [51 words]
t. barrAug 23, 2010 16:17

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Kochs support cancer research while shamelessly polluting the environment by LT

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.