Stealth - yes

Reader comment on: The New Yorker on David and Charles Koch

Submitted by JH (United States), Aug 24, 2010 15:56

When you start, fund, and control a group like 'Americans for Prosperity', and then have them spout lines like "Today, the voices of average Americans are being drowned out by lobbyists and special interests," without noting your corporate sponsorship, that is STEALTH. Get it!

In the last 40 years, average family income has essentially stayed flat. However, wealthy people like the Koch's have seen their incomes and assets rise at a remarkable rate. How is that fair? How is that the American way.


Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

The Future of Capitalism replies:

Is it the American way or "fair" to take money away from wealthy people like the Koch brothers and give it to politicians to dispense to their favorites? The Koch brothers didn't see their incomes and assets rise just through some sort of luck; they worked hard and created a lot of products and services that people freely bought. The family didn't start wealthy. And lots of families that were wealthy 40 years ago aren't wealthy now, and lots of families that were poor 40 years ago are wealthy now. That is the American way.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
The Kochs may be right [177 words]JoeApr 3, 2011 23:56
Kochs support cancer research while shamelessly polluting the environment
[w/response] [59 words]
LTAug 28, 2010 20:02
Interesting Omission by Stoll! [141 words]SteveAug 28, 2010 08:15
Excellent support of corporatism! [31 words]KaiAug 27, 2010 16:26
Political literacy please
[w/response] [48 words]
Ron KampeasAug 28, 2010 18:41
Coins have two sides [105 words]Peter BoyleAug 27, 2010 11:22
Your critique is boring [83 words]Bob JacobsonAug 26, 2010 21:33
10th Worst Polluters in America [127 words]P.J. NuhnAug 26, 2010 09:27
Re: 10th Worst Polluters in America
[w/response] [18 words]
PeepAug 26, 2010 14:29
Koch assistance Welcome in South Carolina [101 words]Timothy N. MoultrieAug 25, 2010 16:39
At least someone did their research [116 words]Peggy VenableAug 25, 2010 15:24
New Yorker piece badly researched [75 words]Eric CramptonAug 24, 2010 23:45
⇒ Stealth - yes
[w/response] [83 words]
JHAug 24, 2010 15:56
Center for Public Integrity is not left wing
[w/response] [133 words]
Randy BarrettAug 24, 2010 14:58
Is this what passes for journalism these days? [89 words]Carol SkaffAug 24, 2010 13:39
Not a dime yet, but we're hoping! [17 words]WildwillAug 23, 2010 16:49
Well said [47 words]TJohnsonAug 23, 2010 16:23
Mr. Stoll's bias is ridiculously evident in his criticism of Jane Mayer's New Yorker article on the Kochs
[w/response] [51 words]
t. barrAug 23, 2010 16:17

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Stealth - yes by JH

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.