Loopholes are life-savers

Reader comment on: Andrew Sorkin on Estate Tax and Carry-Over Basis

Submitted by Harry Binswanger (United States), Feb 28, 2019 03:25

1. The issue is not taxation but spending. If the government gives someone a cake, it has to take away that cake from its rightful owner. It may tax it away or inflate it away, or borrow it, crowding out productive expenditures. But no cakes (or Medicare payments, subsidies for Tesla, etc.) fall from heaven. Spending is the government's "take" from the economy; taxation is only one form of taking.

2. The premise of closing this loophole is hatred for "millionaires and billionaires"--i.e., for the great wealth creators. It should not be sanctioned. All existing loopholes should be expanded and new ones created--and they should be tailored at the very rich, as a matter of justice.

Egalitarianism is pure evil.


Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
Thanks but no thanks [63 words]Murray MilesFeb 28, 2019 10:10
Repeal 16th Amendment and the Income Tax (aka, "Progressive" Slavery) [203 words]LawrenceFeb 28, 2019 04:26
⇒ Loopholes are life-savers [120 words]Harry BinswangerFeb 28, 2019 03:25
To tax capital gains made despite relentless tax skims [3 words]James BradleyFeb 27, 2019 19:41
To tax capital gains made despite relentless tax skims [3 words]James BradleyFeb 27, 2019 19:40
Just kill the Death Tax [31 words]David Lang WardleFeb 27, 2019 18:12
Estate taxes and the basis step-up [112 words]David E. MoranFeb 27, 2019 17:32
giving away the store at the first point of negotiation [110 words]John GillisFeb 27, 2019 17:16

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Loopholes are life-savers by Harry Binswanger

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.